The Stalin’s Empire Style (or Soviet Classicism) – the architecture of triumph. Part 2.
Moscow Architecture Add commentsby Anni Pelmeni
In the I mentioned that the quantity of living space was the priority of urban planning of Moscow. Standard functional buildings with minimum decorations were indeed the huge part of construction at that period. However, there was another side of Stalin period architecture. It also bore the weight of propaganda. Architecture seemed to be a popular means of propaganda of totalitarian regimes. Soviet techniques were really innovative for that time.
In early 1930s right after the first Metro lines in the city center were launched, that served as a pushing factor to turn special attention to the architecture of the main avenues. The need for more representative architecture was embedded in the so-called Stalin’s Empire style.
This style was heavily dominated by the ideological needs and political climate. Architecture was no longer a means of self-expression of the designers, rather is became an embodiment of main political propaganda. Everything was standardized, prescribed and approved of by the party leaders. The city had to be the part of ideology and transmit the ideas of superiority of Soviet model.
The huge flow of immigration from Soviet Russia left irreplaceable losses in the intellectual and artistic elites. However, the core of the architectors responsible for Stalin’s plans of reconstruction of Moscow were of old pre-revolution school. Those were the ones who had chosen to stay in Soviet Russia instead of immigrating and accepted new regime. The spreading of Stalin’s Empire style was due to the fact that there was a sufficient number of professionals who could plan and design city according to the directives of party bosses. However, their individual fates were not always satisfying…
It is quite easy to grasp the main traits of this style from the most prominent buildings of that time. Below are several pictures:

The most prominent representatives of Stalin’s Empire are those built right after World War II. The political message behind those buildings is clear and straightforward: this is the triumph of Soviet people. Elaborated design definitely makes these building the hallmarks of the city. I’m sure those who have been in Moscow remember the intimidating establishments on Frunzenskaya naberezhnaja.
The major aim of this architecture style was to praise Soviet system and the victorious Red Army. That is also reflected in the decoration designs which after the WWII includes the Red Army’s symbolism: stars, hammer and sickle, bas-relief depicting soldiers and pilots.


What make Stalin’s Empire style easily recognizable are heavy construction structures aiming to underline the power, sustainability and eternity; and abundant use of ideological symbolism in decoration.
Best 15 posts in Moscow Architecture
- How City Architecture can be a Mirror of State Political Regime - January 30th, 2008
- The Stalin’s Empire Style – the architecture of triumph. Part 3. - October 31st, 2007
- The Stalin’s Empire Style (or Soviet Classicism) – the architecture of triumph. Part 1. - October 11th, 2007
- Lenin period in development of Moscow - October 6th, 2007
- Five periods of urban development of Moscow city - October 5th, 2007
If you found this page useful, consider linking to it.
Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site (Ctrl+C to copy)
It will look like this: The Stalin’s Empire Style (or Soviet Classicism) – the architecture of triumph. Part 2.

Октябрь 21st, 2007 at 11:33
Hi,Pelmeni. Thanks for visiting my blog. Hope you can exchange link with me. I has added your blog into my blog list. Go and check it. Nice blog you have too.
Октябрь 24th, 2007 at 18:04
Hi Maxx, thanks a lot for exchange links. I did it too. Have a nice day and enjoy blogging. Pelmeni